Select Page
Another Member of the “Can I eat it?” School of Investing

Another Member of the “Can I eat it?” School of Investing

I was watching a video the other day by a famous YouTuber. He specializes in “modern homesteading” and I find some of his videos informative and entertaining.

However, he went off the rails with one of his comments.

He mentioned someone asked him if they should buy gold and he pointed out that you can’t eat gold. 

I’m rather tired of this silly cliché. So I’ve decided to give this line of thinking a name.

Batteries are not edible. Please do not eat batteries.

The “Can I eat it?” School of Investing

The “Can I eat it?” school of investing is simple. People trained in this method rule out any investment or purchase they can’t eat.

For example, if someone were to ask, “Should I buy a car?”

Answer: “Well, you can’t eat a car, so what is the point?”

“Should I buy stock in Netflix?” “You can’t eat Netflix, so no.”

To be honest I‘ve never heard anyone make the “You can’t eat it” argument for any other investment or purchase decision. But for some reason when it comes to gold people think it is important to be able to eat it.

The notion that you have to be able to eat something in order to want to own it reminds me of small children at that developmental stage where they tend to stick everything in their mouth.

It seems like a fair number of people don’t understand the purpose of gold and so they revert to that childlike instinct of sticking in in their mouth.

I Buy some things knowing I Can’t Eat Them

As it turns out, there are many useful things that people might want to own that in fact can’t be eaten.

Some people have decided that it makes sense to allocate a portion of their savings to physical gold as a way to “store value” (Austrian economists: please don’t take that phrase too technically) and protect purchasing power against inflation and dollar devaluation.

Of course it only makes sense to own gold after you own a lot of other basic necessities.

But if you really must be able to eat an investment for you to be able to consider it–I give you the following dish which uses edible gold leaf as a garnish.

More Bad News for Tesla

More Bad News for Tesla

There is more bad news coming out for Tesla (NASDAQ: TSLA). First, there is a lawsuit pending against CEO Elon Musk and former Tesla CFO that alleges they mislead investors about Model 3 production.

One claim of the lawsuit is as follows:

“As early as mid-2016, Tesla executives responsible for planning and building the Model 3 production line plainly told Defendant Musk and the other Defendants in person, providing specific support for their statements that the Company could never mass produce the Model 3 by the end of 2017. These Tesla executives told Musk and the other Defendants that it was an impossible goal.”


Tesla Forward Guidance not a great Guide

Tesla has a strong history of not meeting their production goals. I’m not saying they always fail to meet their admittedly ambitious goals and below I chronicle a few examples where they did not

Let start with their most recently reported numbers and compare them to past guidance.

According to the Tesla, in a 3 April 2018 release, their Q1 2018 production totaled 34,494 vehicles. Of those 24,728 were Model S and Model X, and 9,766 were Model 3.

Source: ttp://

How was Tesla’s Q2 2016 Guidance?

A Model S that caught fire while charging in 2014

The Q4 2016 Update Letter stated:

“Our Model 3 program is on track to start limited vehicle production in July and to steadily ramp production to exceed 5,000 vehicles per week at some point in the fourth quarter [2017] and 10,000 vehicles per week at some point in 2018.”


Unfortunately Tesla would only produce 2,425 Model 3s in Q4 of 2017. This means that instead of making 5,000 Model 3s in 1 week they made less than half of that in a span of 13 weeks.


Photo Source:

In Q1 2018 so far Tesla has produced, on average, 2,653 total vehicles per week and only 752 Model 3s per week.

So to get to 10,000 Model 3s “sometime” in 2018 weekly Model 3 production would have to go up over 1,229% in the next 9 months.

How was Tesla’s Q4 2017 Guidance?

Model S burning in 2013. Photo from

The Q4 2017 Update Letter stated:

“We continue to target weekly Model 3 production rates of 2,500 by the end of Q1 and 5,000 by the end of Q2. It is important to note that while these are the levels we are focused on hitting and we have plans in place to achieve them, our prior experience on the Model 3 ramp has demonstrated the difficulty of accurately forecasting specific production rates at specific points in time.”

Photo Source:

Well at least they are admitting predictions are difficult! We know from the 3 April 2018 release that in the last week of Q1 Tesla only produced 2,000 model 3s and on average in Q1 2018 Tesla only produced 752 Model 3s. In total they produced just 9,766 Model 3s.

Source: ttp://

But that didn’t stop them from bragging, “The Model 3 output increased exponentially, representing a fourfold increase over last quarter.” Well Q4 2017 Model 3 production was just 2,425 so going up to 9,766 isn’t that great especially when you said you’d be producing that many a week 3 months ago.

How likely is Tesla’s 3 April Guidance?

Tesla provided more forward guidance on 3 April.

“In the past seven days, Tesla produced 2,020 Model 3 vehicles. In the next seven days, we expect to produce 2,000 Model S and X vehicles and 2,000 Model 3 vehicles. It is a testament to the ability of the Tesla production team that Model 3 volume now exceeds Model S and Model X combined. What took our team five years for S/X, took only nine months for Model 3.

Given the progress made thus far and upcoming actions for further capacity improvement, we expect that the Model 3 production rate will climb rapidly through Q2. Tesla continues to target a production rate of approximately 5,000 units per week in about three months, laying the groundwork for Q3 to have the long-sought ideal combination of high volume, good gross margin and strong positive operating cash flow. As a result, Tesla does not require an equity or debt raise this year, apart from standard credit lines.”


I read that as a total of 4,000 vehicles per week, at least in “the next seven days”. Then they go on to say that they will produce 5,000 units (which I read as Model 3s) by June.

They would need to more than double their Model 3 production in the next 3 months to hit their targeted production rate of 5,000 units per week by June.

How likely is Tesla’s Q1 2016 Guidance?

In 2016 Tesla said they were planning to build half a million vehicles in 2018. This got a lot of press at the time and people were all excited.

The Q1 2016 Update Letter stated:

“Additionally, given the demand for Model 3, we have decided to advance our 500,000 total unit build plan (combined for Model S, Model X, and Model 3) to 2018, two years earlier than previously planned. Increasing production five fold over the next two years will be challenging and will likely require some additional capital, but this is our goal and we will be working hard to achieve it.”


How likely is Musk and Company to produce this many vehicles?

Well let’s assume for a minute that Tesla, starting in Q2 is able to produce on average 4,000 (Model X, S, 3) vehicles per week in Q2 for a total of 52,000.

Then they are able to produce 7,000 vehicles (Model X, S, 3) for the remainder of the year without disruption for a second half total of 182,000.

Those three quarters combined would be 234,00 vehicles and added to the 34,494 produced in Q1 and you get to 268,494, so its a little over half of the stated goal they listed in the Q1 2016 Update Letter.

Remember Tesla did not produce 4,000 vehicles in a week in Q1. They said “In the next seven days, we expect to produce 2,000 Model S and X vehicles and 2,000 Model 3 vehicles.” Bold added.

On average in Q1 the total combined production was just 2,688. So thinking they could produce 4,000 vehicles a week consistently, in Q2 and 7,000 in the second half of 2018 is giving Tesla a big benefit of the doubt.

Another way to look at it is even if they can double production starting in Q2, up to 5,376 total vehicles per week they would only get to 209,664 by the end of the year. So it seems highly unlikely Tesla will reach 500,000 vehicles produced by the end of 2018.

A picture of the 25 March 2018 Tesla crash which resulted in a fatality. Photo From Business Insider

Photo Source:

Tesla Pauses Model 3 Production

In addition to the lawsuit the other recent bad news for Tesla is in regard to Model 3 production. Production of the Model 3 has halted at least twice already in 2018, first in February from the 20th-24th. Another halt started today and is estimated to last 4-5 days.


Forecasting Is Hard

To paraphrase Yogi Berra, forecasting is hard, especially about the future. However, providing the best possible “forward guidance” is what publicly traded companies are expected to do. At best Tesla is not very good at predicting what they will be able to do and at worse they are being deceptive. To be clear I am not saying Tesla intentionally attempting to deceive investors.

I do think that Elon Musk, at times, has demonstrated a rather fluid relationship with reality.

On the one hand I admire his vision, I remember doing some research into Mars exploration and terraforming when I was in college so it is exciting that Musk is interested in colonizing the red planet as well. Flamethrowers are also awesome. The idea of the hyperloop is a fascinating concept.

The guy is not afraid to dream big and I admire him for that. But on the other hand I think it is possible that he misleads investors and with billions on the line I have a problem with that.

Tesla is in Trouble

Tesla continues to hemorrhage cash and increase debt.

People are taking notice. A recent tweet by the Economist prompted an almost Trumpian response (and forward guidance about Q3 and Q4) from Musk.

Maybe Musk didn’t mean 2018?

I predict that Tesla will not be cashflow positive in Q3 2018. I further predict Tesla will not be cashflow positive in Q4 2018.

Good Marketing and Design Don’t Mean a Good Manufacturer

Tesla Model X

I’ve wanted a car with “gull-wing” doors ever since watching Back to the Future as a kid. Photo from Motor Trend

A recent article by Jim Collins points out that Tesla is a horrible automobile manufacturer.

“Tesla is the worst car manufacturer in the developed world. Bar none. Note that I didn’t write “designer” or “marketer,” but manufacturer. Musk had zero auto industry experience when founding Tesla and CTO J.T. Straubel—who according to Tesla’s 10-K filing personally holds Tesla’s important patents—developed a love for electric vehicles by rebuilding golf carts. It’s just astounding to me that the markets are affording a $50 billion valuation to a company that can’t perform the most basic task for which it was incorporated.”



Even though Tesla designs some great looking automobiles and does a heck of a job marketing them doesn’t mean Tesla is a good business or a company in which a person should invest.

And in fact quarter after quarter of negative free cashflow, missing many production targets and increasing debt would suggest that Tesla is a very bad business.

None of those facts will stop a believer from believing as summarized I think by this tweet:

We will see if shorting Tesla is a good idea or not soon enough.

Disclaimer: John has a short position in TSLA